Soldier Found Guilty In HIV Case

When Dalton first tested positive, he was spared being deployed to Iraq, but was not challenged on his possible gayness. North Carolina law stipulates that HIV positive people may not have sex without a condom and not without first notifying their partner of their condition. Homosexual acts remain a violation of the military code of conduct. It remains unknown if the teenager's serostatus can be directly traced to Dalton.
When I first blogged about Dalton's arrest back in July, there seemed to be a consensus here that an 18 year-old should be responsible for his own sexual protection. It's interesting that Dalton was convicted for violating a direct order and committing an indecent act, rather than for the HIV aspect of his act. Perhaps military law superseded the NC law? Anybody know?